Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2412•Timothy S. Brandon v. City of Richmond, Virginia
01-2412Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.09.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2412
TIMOTHY S. BRANDON; WILLIAM L. DEW,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA; CALVIN JAMISON,
City Manager for the City of Richmond; JACK
MCELFISH, Fire Chief of the City of Richmond;
JOHN TUNSTALL, Division Fire Chief for the
City of Richmond; LARRY TUNSTALL, Division
Fire Chief for the City of Richmond,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-00-874-3)
Submitted: September 12, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert P. Geary, Richmond, Virginia; William S. Francis, Jr.,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. Beverly A. Burton, Senior
Assistant City Attorney, Keith A. May, Assistant City Attorney,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Timothy S. Brandon and William L. Dew appeal the magistrate
judge’s order denying relief on their employment discrimination
action. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the magistrate judge. * See Brandon v. City of Richmond,
No. CA-00-874-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.