Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2311•Pernorris Taylor, Sr v. Daily Planet
01-2311Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.02.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2311
PERNORRIS TAYLOR, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAILY PLANET; MR. MALVEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-2417
PERNORRIS TAYLOR, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; KAREN JUNGER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-713-3, CA-01-762-3)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Pernorris Taylor appeals from two district court orders dis-
missing without prejudice his civil complaints for failure to
comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, which requires a short, plain state-
ment of the facts giving rise to each claim. Because Taylor can
amend his complaints in both cases by compliance with Rule 8, and
a dismissal without prejudice is generally unappealable, we dismiss
the appeal. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.