Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2167•William Lee Richardson, Jr v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
01-2167Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.12.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2167
WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED STATES SENATE,
Plaintiffs,
versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; THE STATE OF
MARYLAND; BRADY GUN LAW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin,
District Judge. (CA-01-610-2)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil complaint in which he challenges
the constitutionality of the Brady gun law. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. FBI, No. CA-01-610-
2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.