Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2165•In re: Michael D. Wilkins
01-2165Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.03.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2165
In Re: MICHAEL D. WILKINS,
Debtor.
MICHAEL D. WILKINS,
Debtor - Appellant,
versus
JAMES MURRAY; ANZILIA W. MURRAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-840-3, BK-99-34315-SCS, 00-3024-AP, 00-
3048-AP, 00-3060-AP, 00-3075-AP, 00-3139-AP, 00-3163-AP)
Submitted: February 25, 2002 Decided: March 12, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce H. Matson, Troy
Savenko, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Wilkins appeals from the district court’s orders
affirming the bankruptcy court’s resolution of his objection to
Appellees’ amended proof of claim and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s
orders, and the bankruptcy court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Wilkins v. Murray, Nos. CA-00-840-3; BK-99-34315-SCS (E.D.
Va. July 12, 2001; July 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.