Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2066•Ned N. Cary, Jr v. Social Security Administration
01-2066Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.02.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2066
NED N. CARY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMONWEALTH
OF VIRGINIA; US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-01-31)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 13, 2002
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ned N. Cary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; George G. Davidson,
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland; Louis Edward
Matthews, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Rich-
mond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ned N. Cary, Jr., appeals the district court’s order: (1) de-
nying relief on his complaint alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C.A.
§ 1983 (West Supp. 2001); and (2) upholding the Commissioner’s
decision that Cary is not entitled to disability insurance bene-
fits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Cary v. Social Security Admin.,
No. CA-01-31 (E.D. Va. July 11, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.