Ashland D. Fortune v. Town of Louisa

01-2051Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.02.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2051
ASHLAND D. FORTUNE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOWN OF LOUISA; DONALD S. GALLIHUGH; GREGORY
H. FERGUSON; KIMBERLY SPROUSE, the Adminis-
tratrix of the Estate of Henry Kennon,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (CA-00-42-3)
Submitted: January 22, 2002 Decided: February 4, 2002
Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip S. Marstiller, PHILLIP S. MARSTILLER, P.C., Richmond, Vir-
ginia, for Appellant. Anton J. Stelly, William S. Smithers, Jr.,
THOMPSON, SMITHERS, NEWMAN, WADE & CHILDRESS, Richmond, Virginia;
William F. Etherington, BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON & ETHERINGTON,
P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ashland D. Fortune appeals from the district court’s orders
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fortune
v. Town of Louisa, No. CA-00-42-3 (W.D. Va. July 18 & Aug. 3,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.