Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2022•Kathleen A. Miller v. Richard Danzig, Secretary of the Navy
01-2022Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.01.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2022
KATHLEEN A. MILLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-422-2)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathleen A. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen A. Miller appeals the district court’s order entering
judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Secretary of the Navy
on her claims of discrimination and retaliation in violation of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-797 (West 1999 &
Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Danzig, No. CA-00-
422-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 14, 2001; entered June 15, 2001). We
deny Miller’s motion to stay the case. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.