Sally N. Noveras, R.n v. Deaton Hospital & Specialty Center

01-1839Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.10.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1839
SALLY N. NOVERAS, R.N.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEATON HOSPITAL & SPECIALTY CENTER; MARYLAND
GENERAL HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
00-1060-CCB)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sally N. Noveras, Appellant Pro Se. Jeanne Marie Phelan,
WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland; Linda S. Woolf,
Kristen Nichole Nesbitt, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & GRAY, L.L.P.,
Baltimore, Maryland; James Patrick Gillece, Jr., Tracy Anne Warren,
MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sally Noveras appeals from the district court’s order granting
the Defendants’ motions to dismiss, denying her motion for appoint-
ment of counsel, and dismissing, for failure to state a claim, her
employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Noveras v. Deaton Hosp. & Specialty Ctr., No. CA-00-1060-CCB (D.
Md. June 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.