Thomas W. Hill v. Jeffrey P. Hunt

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1781
THOMAS W. HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFFREY P. HUNT; ATHENA BROOKS; C. RANDY POOL;
ZORO J. GUICE, JR.; J. MARLENE HYATT; BOYD B.
MASSAGEE; SHARON B. ALEXANDER; STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CA-01-64-1-T)
Submitted: October 19, 2001 Decided: October 31, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas W. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, Roy Cooper,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina; W. Scott Jones, LONG, PARKER, WARREN & JONES, P.A., Ashe-
ville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas W. Hill appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint raising claims under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983,
1985 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), and seeking injunctive, declaratory,
and monetary relief, including the removal of a criminal case from
state court. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Hunt, No. CA-01-64-1-
T (W.D.N.C. filed May 15, 2001; entered May 16, 2001). We deny
Hill’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --