Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-1737•Donna Parker v. Richard Danzig, Secretary of the Navy
01-1737Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.12.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1737
DONNA PARKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CA-00-412-2)
Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
J. Gray Lawrence, Jr., FAGGERT & FRIEDEN, P.C., Chesapeake, Vir-
ginia, for Appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney,
Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donna Lee Parker appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendant on her claim of sexual discrimination
filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (1994). We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Parker v. Danzig, No. CA-00-412-2 (E.D. Va. Mar.
30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.