011677R2.U

01-1677Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.05.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
Filed: May 30, 2001
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1677
VULCAN CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED;
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,*
versus
PHILLIP J. BARKER, d/b/a Sabra Asia,
Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
_______________
On May 29, 2001, at 11:55 a.m., E.D.T., Judge Widener entered
an order as a single judge under F.R.A.P. 8 due to the requirements
of time, which order stayed an order of the district court entered
in this case which enjoined Barker from appearing in any other
proceeding in any other court until the Vulcan plaintiffs’ petition
to vacate the California arbitration award had been disposed of in
the district court for the Western District of Virginia.
On that same day, May 29, 2001, the Vulcan plaintiffs filed a
motion for reconsideration of Judge Widener’s order of May 29, and

-- 1 of 2 --

also on that same day our clerk’s office assigned Judge Motz and
Judge King as the other members of a panel to review Judge
Widener’s said order.
In their said motion for reconsideration filed May 29, 2001,
the Vulcan defendants requested immediate consideration of that
motion, noting in the motion and by letter that the California
Superior Court had set a hearing on the merits of the case, among
other things, for today, May 30, at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time (5:00
p.m. E.D.T.).
The panel has considered on its merits the motion of the
Vulcan defendants to reconsider the said order of Judge Widener of
May 29, and, in so doing, it has considered all of the papers,
including letters, submitted to it by the attorneys.
The panel is of opinion that the said order of Judge Widener
of May 29, 2001 is free from error.
It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said motion of
the Vulcan defendants for reconsideration of Judge Widener’s order
of May 29, 2001 shall be, and the same hereby is, denied.
With the concurrences of Judge Motz and Judge King.
Entered at 2:50 p.m. E.D.T. May 30, 2001.
/s/
__________________________
H. E. Widener, Jr.
For the Court
* The plaintiffs here are the defendants in the case in the
California state court.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.