Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-1490•In re: Coleman Craten, LLC; Monica Lynn Coleman
01-1490Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.08.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1490
In Re: COLEMAN CRATEN, LLC; MONICA LYNN
COLEMAN,
Debtors.
MONICA LYNN COLEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LORI S. SIMPSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01-
3634-L, BK-99-56239-SD, AP-99-56381-SD)
Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monica Lynn Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Gerald Hroblak,
WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Monica Coleman appeals from the district court’s order denying
her motion for leave to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order grant-
ing in part and denying in part the trustees’ motion to compel.
Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Coleman v. Simpson, Nos. CA-01-3634-L; BK-99-
56239-SD; AP-99-56381-SD (D. Md. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr.
2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.