Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-1168•David B. Carr v. Blue Cross
01-1168Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.07.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1168
DAVID B. CARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
RICHARD P. HORNE; DICK HORNE INSURANCE AGENCY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-99-3155-2-18AJ)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: July 31, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David B. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. John H. Tiller, HAYNSWORTH,
SINKLER, BOYD, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David B. Carr seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order remanding
Carr’s civil action to the state court. Remand orders are generally
not reviewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (1994). Accord-
ingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument,
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.