Robert v. Hartnett, Jr

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1116
ROBERT V. HARTNETT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT E. GLIDDEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,
Chief District Judge. (CA-99-29-2-BO)
Submitted: October 24, 2001 Decided: November 13, 2001
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert V. Hartnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Danny Ray Glover, Jr.,
Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert V. Hartnett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying Hartnett’s motion for new trial, sustaining the jury’s ver-
dict and damage award. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hartnett v.
Glidden, No. CA-99-29-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --