Patrick Britton, a/k/a Gary Louis Ellis v. THOMAS A. CONSTANTINE, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration

00-7818Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.04.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7818
PATRICK BRITTON, a/k/a Gary Louis Ellis,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS A. CONSTANTINE, Administrator, Drug
Enforcement Administration; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-
2524-L)
Submitted: March 30, 2001 Decided: April 24, 2001
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Britton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Britton appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Britton v. Constantine, No. CA-00-2524-L
(D. Md. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.