Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-7809•Michael A. Williams v. JOHN SANDERS, West Virginia Department of Highways
00-7809Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.03.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7809
MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN SANDERS, West Virginia Department of
Highways,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-114-2)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Kozakewich, Jr.,
STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion for ap-
pointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Williams v. Sanders, No. CA-99-114-2 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 7,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.