Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-7795•Patricia Ann Williams v. Warden, Women’s Correctional Institution
00-7795Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.02.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7795
PATRICIA ANN WILLIAMS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN, WOMEN’S CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION;
CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the
State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.
(CA-00-3163-3-23)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Ann Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Ann Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the mag-
istrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. Williams v. Warden, Women’s Correc-
tional Institution, No. CA-00-3163-3-23 (D.S.C. filed Nov. 20,
2000; entered Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.