Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-7747•Wendell M. Beard v. THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden
00-7747Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.04.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7747
WENDELL M. BEARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; PATRICK CONROY, War-
den; WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-00-753-JFM)
Submitted: February 23, 2001 Decided: April 3, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wendell M. Beard, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wendell M. Beard appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Beard v. Corcoran,
No. CA-00-753-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.