Darrell James Debrew v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7725
DARRELL JAMES DEBREW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United
States; KATHLEEN HAWKS, Director of the Fed-
eral Bureau of Prisons; C. E. FLOYD, Warden;
MS. RAINWATER, Assistant Supervisor of Med-
ical; HADWIN, Secretary; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
PRISONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-3603-3-17BC)
Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 3, 2001
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell James Debrew, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Darrell James Debrew appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the court’s order granting in part
and denying in part Defendants’ summary judgment motion in this
action filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000). We dis-
miss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not
appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and col-
lateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The
order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --