Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-7692•Lynn Atkinson, Jr v. Jeannie Lancaster
00-7692Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.03.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7692
LYNN ATKINSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JAMES BARRETT, III,
Plaintiff,
versus
JEANNIE LANCASTER; THEODORE C. SMILEY; FRANK
EVANS; RUDY S. BRANDON; JEFFREY WILLIAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-625-5-BR)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lynn Atkinson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lynn Atkinson, Jr., a North Carolina inmate, appeals the dis-
trict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Atkinson v. Lan-
caster, No. CA-00-625-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.