Paul Mitchell Burgess v. State of North Carolina

00-7654Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.03.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7654
PAUL MITCHELL BURGESS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; WALTER WHITMAN,
Superintendent of Adult Correctional Institu-
tion; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of the De-
partment of Corrections for the State of North
Carolina; SUPERINTENDENT CLARK,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-95-283-3-MU-2)
Submitted: March 6, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Mitchell Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Ledford Cheek,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Mitchell Burgess appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Burgess v. North Carolina, No.
CA-95-283-3-MU-2 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.