Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-7550•Anthony Joseph Turner v. K. L. OSBORNE, Warden
00-7550Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.05.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7550
ANTHONY JOSEPH TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; DOCTOR ANGLIKER; DOCTOR
RAYNAUD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-95-1106-7)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Joseph Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn,
Jr., GUYNN & DILLON, Roanoke, Virginia; Larry Benson Kirksey,
Bristol, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Joseph Turner appeals the district court’s order
denying his requests to restructure the court-arranged disbursement
schedule of his settlement award. Our review of the record and the
district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v.
Osborne, No. CA-95-1106-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2000). We deny
Turner’s motions for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.