United States of America v. Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, a/k/a Tynell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7407
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALDO TYNELL LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Tynell,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-98-150, CA-99-705-3)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 22, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, John
Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Lightfoot, Nos. CR-98-
150; CA-99-705-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --