Toissant De’vinci Bassett v. RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections

00-7327Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.05.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7327
TOISSANT DE’VINCI BASSETT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of
Corrections,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-99-863-3)
Submitted: February 16, 2001 Decided: May 15, 2001
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Toissant De’Vinci Bassett, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Toissant De’Vinci Bassett seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Bassett v. Angelone, No.
CA-99-863-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2000). We also deny Bassett’s re-
quest for an extension of time in which to appeal the “transcript
decision” of the district court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (re-
quiring that motions for extension of time be filed with district
court). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.