United States of America v. Michael Scott McRae

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7315
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CR-97-94)
Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: March 7, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Scott McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., As-
sistant United States Attorney, John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Scott McRae appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. McRae, No. CR-97-94 (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --