Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-7305•William G. Harden v. WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
00-7305Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.02.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7305
WILLIAM G. HARDEN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional
Institution; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
SOUTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-3091-6-10AK)
Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William G. Harden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William G. Harden appeals from the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition without prejudice. Because
Harden does not challenge the district court’s disposition and
because his request for enforcement was not presented to the dis-
trict court, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense
with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the district court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.