Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-7155•In re: Wayne Thomas Johnson
00-7155Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.12.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7155
In Re: WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Thomas Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wayne T. Johnson petitions this court for a writ of mandamus
directing a North Carolina state court to act on Johnson’s Motion
for Appropriate Relief. Federal courts have no general power to
compel action by state courts. See Davis v. Lansing, 851 F.2d 72,
74 (2d Cir. 1988); Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County,
411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, while we grant
Johnson’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we deny
his petition for a writ of mandamus, his motion for general relief,
and his motion to compel a ruling. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.