United States of America v. Frederick Carleton Tuck

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7053
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FREDERICK CARLETON TUCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-98-43, CA-00-176-7)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Carleton Tuck, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce A. Pagel, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Carleton Tuck seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2000) and a subsequent motion for reconsideration filed under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability, deny Tuck’s motion to expedite the
appeal as moot, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See United States v. Tuck, Nos. CR-98-43; CA-00-176-7
(W.D. Va. June 27 & July 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --