United States of America v. James M. Richman

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6669
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES M. RICHMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-94-54, CA-98-605-7)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James M. Richman, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James M. Richman seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Richman’s
motion for transcripts at government expense, deny a certificate of
appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Richman, Nos. CR-94-54; CA-
98-605-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --