Douglas Wayne Williams v. Louis Babbs

00-6613Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.11.2000

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6613
DOUGLAS WAYNE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS BABBS; DOCTOR SWANTON; MR. HINDS; NURSE
RAMSEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-850-CT-5-H)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Wayne Williams, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Wayne Williams appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Williams v. Babbs, No. CA-98-850-CT-5-H
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.