Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-6559•United States of America v. MICHAEL RAY SMITH, JR., a/k/a Red, a/k/a Black Mike
00-6559Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.07.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6559
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL RAY SMITH, JR., a/k/a Red, a/k/a Black
Mike,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-97-3006, CA-99-465-7)
Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 24, 2000
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Ray Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Ray Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-97-
3006; CA-99-465-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.