Paul Dion Brown v. George Trent

00-6486Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.08.2000

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6486
PAUL DION BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE TRENT; DAVID DEAN; MICHAEL COLEMAN,
A.W.O., Official and Individual Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge.
(CA-98-350-5)
Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 30, 2000
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Dion Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Jeanette Bray, George John
Joseph, BAILEY & WYANT, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; Leslie
K. Kiser, Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DEPART-
MENT OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Dion Brown appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and sustaining the
defendant’s objections and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v.
Trent, No. CA-98-350-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.