Robert M. Kirsch, Jr v. RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Medical Department

00-6301Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.06.2000

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6301
ROBERT M. KIRSCH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Medical
Department; NFN GUNTLER, Lieutenant; NFN
ESKERIDGE, Doctor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenwood. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-99-1365-9-17RB)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert M. Kirsch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
II, James Miller Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A.,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert M. Kirsch, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See Kirsch v. Richland County Detention Ctr., No. CA-
99-1365-9-17RB (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.