Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-6151•William Allen Legg v. ARCHIE GEE, Warden
00-6151Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.05.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6151
WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARCHIE GEE, Warden; ASSISTANT WARDEN SPANGLER;
FERNINAND MASSARI, Doctor; KRIPPA KASHYAP,
Doctor; RICHARD CRAIG, Doctor; ROY SWANSON,
Lieutenant; HILLARY JOHNSON, Sergeant; ALL
LISTED DEFENDANTS IN ORIGINAL SUIT 1998; ALL
NEW OR FOUND OUT DEFENDANTS IN THIS SUIT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
99-3860-DKC)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Allen Legg, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1999). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Legg v. Gee, No. CA-
99-3860-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.