United States of America v. Clayton Douglas Dangerfield

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6107
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLAYTON DOUGLAS DANGERFIELD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CR-93-83)
Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clayton Douglas Dangerfield, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew R. Hubbell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Dangerfield’s appeal of this order was dismissed in United
States v. Dangerfield, No. 98-6694 (4th Cir. Nov. 16, 1998)
(unpublished).
2
PER CURIAM:
Clayton Douglas Dangerfield seeks to appeal the district
court’s orders denying his 1997 motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2255 (West Supp. 1999), denying relief on his second habeas
motion, denying his motion for reconsideration before a three-judge
panel, and denying his two motions for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability, dismiss as frivolous the portion of Dangerfield’s appeal
which challenges the denial of his first § 2255 motion, * and dis-
miss the remainder of Dangerfield’s appeal on the ground that his
second habeas motion is successive. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court, and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --