Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-2463•Stephen D. Mellin v. Marine World-Wide Services
00-2463Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.08.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2463
STEPHEN D. MELLIN,
Petitioner,
versus
MARINE WORLD-WIDE SERVICES; OFFICE OF WORKERS’
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(98-425-BRB, 97-LHC-187)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jean M. McKeen, RUTTER, WALSH, MILLS & RUTTER, L.L.C., Norfolk,
Virginia; Charles Robinowitz, Portland, Oregon, for Petitioner.
Ronald W. Atwood, RONALD W. ATWOOD, P.C., Portland, Oregon, for
Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen D. Mellin seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of longshore benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986
& Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.
See Mellin v. Marine World-Wide Serv., No. 98-425-BRB; 97-LHC-137
(BRB Nov. 30, 1998; June 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.