Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-2380•Irma Jo Draughon v. Social Services
00-2380Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.02.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2380
IRMA JO DRAUGHON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-177-7-F)
Submitted: February 9, 2001 Decided: February 20, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irma Jo Draughon, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Claiborne Woodruff,
Smithfield, North Carolina; Benjamin R. Warrick, Clinton, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Irma Jo Draughon appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her complaint against the Sampson County Department of Social Ser-
vices as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of Draughon’s complaint based
on the reasoning of the district court. See Draughon v. Social
Services, No. CA-00-177-7-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2000). Sampson
County Department of Social Services’ motion to dismiss and impose
sanctions is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.