Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-2281•Jessie B. Hayes v. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, US Postal Service
00-2281Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.02.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2281
JESSIE B. HAYES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, US
Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-99-3522-2-18)
Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 27, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie B. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jessie B. Hayes appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hayes v.
Henderson, No. CA-99-3522-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.