Michael H. Bostron v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security

00-2238Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.01.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2238
MICHAEL H. BOSTRON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
MAURICE R. DUBOIS; JOHN E. BOYER,
Plaintiffs,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-3154-H)
Submitted: November 22, 2000 Decided: January 18, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael H. Bostron, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael H. Bostron appeals the district court’s order granting
judgment as a matter of law to the Commissioner in Bostron’s civil
action in which he alleged employment discrimination claims. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Bostron v. Apfel, No. CA-97-3154-H (D. Md.
July 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.