EVA M. WRIGHT, Widow of Clarence M. Wright v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Pro- Grams, United States Department of Labor

00-2083Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.06.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2083
EVA M. WRIGHT, Widow of Clarence M. Wright,
Petitioner,
versus
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PRO-
GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; SEA
“B” MINING COMPANY,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(99-976-BLA, 99-176-BLA)
Submitted: February 20, 2001 Decided: June 18, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eva Wright, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Sarah Marie
Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.;
Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia,
for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eva Wright seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s deci-
sion and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of
black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986
& Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.
See Wright v. DOWCP, Nos. 99-976-BLA; 99-176-BLA. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.