Cynthia Bernice White v. ANTHONY SANCES, JR., Ph.D., individually

00-1985Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.03.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1985
CYNTHIA BERNICE WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANTHONY SANCES, JR., Ph.D., individually; BIO-
MECHANICS INSTITUTE, LIMITED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-99-2128-AW)
Submitted: January 26, 2001 Decided: March 13, 2001
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erik D. Frye, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. John A. McCauley,
Andrew M. Dansicker, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, L.L.P., Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Bernice White appeals the district court’s orders:
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss this action alleging breach
of contract, negligence, and professional malpractice; and denying
her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See White
v. Sances, No. CA-99-2128-AW (D. Md. filed April 26, 2000, entered
April 27, 2000; filed June 22, 2000, entered June 23, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.