Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1974•John Alpar v. National Park Service
00-1974Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.11.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1974
JOHN ALPAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, District
Judge. (CA-00-43-4-F)
Submitted: October 20, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Alpar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Alpar appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
complaint of wrongful employment practice under 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2000) and because it was filed after
expiration of the applicable statutes of limitations. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the
reasoning of the district court. See Alpar v. National Park Serv.,
No. CA-00-43-4-F (E.D.N.C. June 8, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.