Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1854•Arthur O. Armstrong v. Koury Corporation
00-1854Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.05.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1854
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KOURY CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1005
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KOURY CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (MISC-00-49-1)
Submitted: April 10, 2001 Decided: May 8, 2001
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong seeks to
appeal the district court’s orders denying leave to file a com-
plaint and denying reconsideration of the order denying leave to
file a complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find
the appeals frivolous and affirm. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.