Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1767•David L. Bupp v. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
00-1767Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.10.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1767
DAVID L. BUPP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-99-553-2)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David L. Bupp, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David L. Bupp appeals the district court’s order granting De-
fendant’s motion for summary judgment in Bupp’s employment discrim-
ination action alleging racial and sexual discrimination, and
retaliation. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Bupp v. Henderson, No. CA-99-553-2
(E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.