Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1749•Deloyise Echols v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CA-00-247-A
00-1749Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.02.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1749
DELOYISE ECHOLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary, Department of the
Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-247-A)
Submitted: December 15, 2000 Decided: February 1, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorrance D. Dickens, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Helen F.
Fahey, United States Attorney, Edward J. Martin, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deloyise Echols appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his action alleging employment discrimination and denying his
motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Echols v. Caldera,
No. CA-00-247-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.