Douglas Scardo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1642
DOUGLAS SCARDO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(CA-99-146-1)
Submitted: January 10, 2001 Decided: January 24, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Morefield, MOREFIELD, KENDRICK, HESS & LARGEN, P.C.,
Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Marilyn M. Cochran, Allan M.
Marcus, New York, New York, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Scardo appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
(MetLife) on his claim that MetLife unreasonably terminated his
long-term disability benefits. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scardo
v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., No. CA-99-146-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 18,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --