Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1287•Frantz Claude v. Northwest Airlines, Incorporated
00-1287Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.02.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1287
FRANTZ CLAUDE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.
(CA-99-1269-A)
Submitted: January 23, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lathal Ponder, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John J. Gallagher,
Kenneth M. Willner, Dianne C. Coombs, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY &
WALKER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM
Frantz Claude appeals from the order of the district court
dismissing his complaint against Northwest Airlines, Inc. (“North-
west”). We have reviewed the briefs and materials submitted in the
appendices and find that each count contained in Claude’s complaint
was properly subject to summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm
the order dismissing Claude’s complaint against Northwest on the
reasoning of the district court. Claude v. Northwest Airlines, No.
CA-98-107-7 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.