Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1043•Curtis E. Salyers v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security
00-1043Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.06.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1043
CURTIS E. SALYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-169-2)
Submitted: May 23, 2000 Decided: June 19, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph E. Wolfe, Erick A. Bowman, WOLFE & FARMER, Norton, Virginia,
for Appellant. John M. Sacchetti, Regional Chief Counsel, Patricia
M. Smith, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, Robert W. Flynn, Assistant
Regional Counsel, Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Robert P. Crouch, Jr.,
United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States
Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis E. Salyers appeals the district court’s order affirming
the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Admin-
istration denying disability benefits. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s
report and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court. See Salyers v. Apfel, No. CA-98-169-2 (W.D. Va.
Nov. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.