Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1020•Gino Cornelius Cauthern v. Goodwill Industries, of Northwest North Carolina
00-1020Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.06.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1020
GINO CORNELIUS CAUTHERN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, of Northwest North Carolina,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-98-693-1)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 20, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gino Cornelius Cauthern, Appellant Pro Se. Penni Pearson Bradshaw,
Eugene Hamilton Matthews, Sr., KILPATRICK STOCKTON, L.L.P.,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gino Cornelius Cauthern appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in Defendant’s favor in this employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cauthern v.
Goodwill Indus., No. CA-98-693-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 1999). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.