Timothy Suggs v. Prince Court, LLC

26-1322United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit28.07.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-1322

TIMOTHY E. SUGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PRINCE COURT, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Brian Scott Meyers, Magistrate Judge. (4:25-cv -00112-FL-BM)

Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 28, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy E. Suggs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy E. Suggs seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s recommendation to the
district court that Suggs’s civil complaint be dismissed. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The magistrate judge’s recommendation is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.